🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, protest has ceased to be a basic freedom. Instead, it has become a conditional permission that those in power grant or deny as they see fit. This constitutes the implication of new regulations that the ruling administration is advancing, which would dictate the timing and location demonstrations can take place, with potential imprisonment for those who disobey these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Democratic Rights

Previous administrations had already undermined this fundamental freedom: the previous Tory administration had given law enforcement extensive new authorities, which global rights bodies had condemned as "serious and unjustified limitations" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these incremental assaults on liberty have practically eliminated the historically earned right to public demonstration.

Using Atrocity to Justify Suppression

The most recent restrictive measures are being justified by citing last week's terrible anti-Jewish assault on a Manchester mosque. We can all agree on universal agreement that the safety of British Jews must be protected. However, employing this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress opposition is not only disconnected to that duty but distorts it.

"If you cannot set boundaries at genocide, you likely can't establish limits at democracy," commented a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Reflect on Britain's long tradition of public demonstration and direct action against racism and authoritarianism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to after World War II Jewish anti-fascist movements and the 1970s mobilizations against the far-right organization. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their time, even while they were advocating the rights of minorities.

Current Reality

In today's complex situation, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing what United Nations investigations have described as genocide. Its warfare have prompted the global justice body to issue arrest warrants against Israel's prime minister and his former defense minister.

International popular sentiment has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a substantial majority of the public believe Israel has probably committed war crimes. Most people would endorse a total prohibition on arms sales to the state, and approve the arrest of the Israeli leader.

Silencing Dissent

Having largely lost the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to try to suppress a popular campaign against a moral catastrophe. The British government appears to be included in this effort. Ministers have failed to implement extensive restrictions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to proceed.

People who are demonstrating against the erasure of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a broader crackdown on these protesters until now: extremely few protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Merging Jewish identity with the policies of the Israeli state is not only manipulative but also dangerous. The standard interpretation of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been rightly challenged for potentially restricting valid commentary of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its key examples: that "holding Jewish people collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a situation where law enforcement can propose that protests opposing Israel's actions should be canceled because they might "accidentally or deliberately" support anti-Jewish sentiment. Similarly, political figures have stated that acknowledgment of Palestinian statehood has made political parties "complicit" in alleged abuse experienced by Jewish communities.

Double Standards

On the very day as the religious center assault, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – increasing the horrific toll from two years of ongoing violence that have claimed tens of thousands of human lives. British political leaders and news organizations have barely concealed the minimal importance they assign to Palestinian life. This represents one of the most brazen demonstrations of discrimination in our time.

Crossing Thresholds

Our government has already crossed a dangerous boundary by banning Palestine Action, a peaceful, human rights-focused activist collective. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been detained, primarily for holding signs against mass killing and endorsing the banned organization. Many of those arrested are pensioners; among them a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this trajectory leads. In the United States, political leaders helped demonize demonstrations supporting Palestine: a former House Speaker implied that some were "connected to" other nations, while the current president described such protests as antisemitic. In doing so, they contributed to normalizing the repressive measures on such demonstrations – and on free speech in general.

Looking Ahead

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress opposition. What might a Reform government do with this restrictive framework? Our ancestors fought, suffered and sacrificed their lives to secure our freedoms. We may eventually rue how casually we allowed them to slip away.