🔗 Share this article

Just two days prior to the NYC race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond the winner citywide, but precinct by precinct. The analyst, an expert in elections born and raised in the city, has spent over a decade in left-leaning activism and has become something of a local celebrity recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He released his highly detailed prediction map – which correctly forecast that Zohran Mamdani was victorious although failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, the Narrative War. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from Park Slope to Bushwick to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would win by huge margins, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal surpass the New York Times” in audience and the majority of electors favored the independent, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

How was your election night?

I had to do that because they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the system frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by a dozen percentage points, but came two big batches of votes that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day went kind of poorly for Mamdani, in which Cuomo was going to end up basically increasing his support from the Democratic primary. But the winner gained half a million supporters to his initial base, and this was critical why he succeeded. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani get additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives long aimed for: it’s multiracial, it’s young, tenants and it’s people squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with minority communities, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he boosted his base of left-leaning activists, young leftists, and immigrant groups. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is this significant?

It is a genuine phenomenon, limited to working-class Latinos, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for Trump last year backed the progressive this year. However it’s not that he was winning over Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high turnout. Who did that help?

Both sides. Participation was much greater than anticipated. I thought we might exceed two million, but it reached 2.3M – which is a lot of darn voters. Existed a decent opposition group, energized, but his supporters was equally driven, and that sufficed to win.

You forecasted he’d exceed 50% of the vote. Is he on course for that?

Right now you would say he’s favored to surpass 50%. He’s at just over 50% but remain probably 200,000 votes uncounted as of Wednesday morning. Thus it’s not certain, but I believe it’s likely, and I hope he achieves it so then none can claim the Republican was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His vote completely collapsed.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in the borough, similar to an highly conservative area. That truly surprised me. Cuomo kept Caucasian districts, affluent zones and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained many conservatives on the island who had a strong turnout. I believe there was a lot of strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it prior to Trump endorsed for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your often-discussed left-wing base – did backing for the candidate overwhelming in those parts of Brooklyn and Queens?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, instance, the Greek landlords and residents all went for Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani won – he was polling between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on if the candidate was making inroads with the community. Any indication that he did?

Exist neighborhoods with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the wealthy Jewish communities such as the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the moderate communities including Queens neighborhoods, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned the independent. Plus, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, they were strongly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if there were crazy narrative-busters here, but Mamdani retained more progressive Jewish neighborhoods and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will commie corridor serve as a springboard for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in Brooklyn, Queens and the Bronx. I’m sure that there will be additional examples – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

But I believe that each urban center in the US can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of progressive influence in the nation – since youth reside there, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.